On 2022/03/03 23:00, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > So as far as I'm concerned, here's how I would propose to go forward: > keep py-libknot as a separate port but with a tight requirement on > net/knot. I don't see the point in adding devel to CATEGORIES. > Diff to previous below and updated tarball attached.
OK. DESCR could be reflowed, the lines are a bit short. Default output from fmt looks nice.
