On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:25:21PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: > The ports tree is here for our users convenience. If a port has a > strange license, you can always set the PERMIT_xy fields. Many users > use ion, so why should we harrass them?
It was not a simple question of removing the port because we didn't like the license. It was a question of conformance, at least towards what the author believes the rules now are. > The ports tree is the wrong area to fight license battles, imo. That > said, I am obviously against the removal of ion. That's precisely why I didn't want to fight any. -p.
