On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:44:50AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Actually, it is not a matter of conformance against what the author > believes. Authors believe the most retarded things from time to time.
Sure, but it _was_ due to a possible conformance problem that I suggested the removal of the port, and not because I didn't like the license. That's what I wanted to point out. -p.
