On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:36:43PM +0000, Deanna Phillips wrote: > Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Deanna Phillips [2006-04-23]: > >> Does anyone use this port any more? > > > > Not me. :) > > > >> I've had a tough time getting it to work. I'm not sure whether > >> it's because of misconfiguration by my employer, changes in > >> Cisco operation, or horrible documentation, and I can't really > >> work on it much since I get locked out after every few attempts. > > > > It still works out of the box for me. Make install, tweak config file > > start vpnc. vpnc.sh is not needed anymore, for generic use just run > > "vpnc". > > Yeah, none of that works for me. Probably some mistake on my end. > > >> The manual source is available at: > > > > I'll have a look at this over the weekend. > > Don't bother -- it contains errors which I'd rather not correct, > else I be accused of being a perfectionist, or of trying too > hard. ;) > > Joking aside, when I use a port and it doesn't have a manpage, I > feel compelled to write one. It's my belief that every program > on the system, port or not, should have a decent manpage. Am I > alone in this? > > There are few things in unix that aggravate me more than: > > man: no entry for <util> in the manual.
It's probably best to take it up upstream, unless you plan on updating the man page every time the port changes. -Ray-
