Nikolay Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Deanna Phillips [2006-04-23]: >> Does anyone use this port any more? > > Not me. :) > >> I've had a tough time getting it to work. I'm not sure whether >> it's because of misconfiguration by my employer, changes in >> Cisco operation, or horrible documentation, and I can't really >> work on it much since I get locked out after every few attempts. > > It still works out of the box for me. Make install, tweak config file > start vpnc. vpnc.sh is not needed anymore, for generic use just run > "vpnc".
Yeah, none of that works for me. Probably some mistake on my end. >> The manual source is available at: > > I'll have a look at this over the weekend. Don't bother -- it contains errors which I'd rather not correct, else I be accused of being a perfectionist, or of trying too hard. ;) Joking aside, when I use a port and it doesn't have a manpage, I feel compelled to write one. It's my belief that every program on the system, port or not, should have a decent manpage. Am I alone in this? There are few things in unix that aggravate me more than: man: no entry for <util> in the manual. -- deanna at sdf
