Possibly correcting myself here...

Alexander Hall wrote:
...
And (part of) ``pkg_info -K -L expat-1.95.6 libiconv-1.9.2p1 glib2-2.8.3 gettext-0.14.5'' reads:

----8<---- Long list again ----8<----
Information for glib2-2.8.3
...
@file /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcache.h
@file /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gcompletion.h
-------------------------------------

...but continues later on:
----------------------------------------------------------
@file /usr/local/share/locale/yi/LC_MESSAGES/glib20.mo
@file /usr/local/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/glib20.mo
@file /usr/local/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/glib20.mo
@lib /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.800.3
@lib /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.800.3
@lib /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.800.3
----------------------------------------------------------

So I say to myself: Aha! They _were_ in fact ``in a dependent package, but not tagged with @lib'', as suggested.

Well, no, it seems not. So I do not really get this. Please pick up your finest clue-by-four and get it on. I could make guesses, but then again, I could just hope for an educated (and educating!) answer instead.

/Alexander

Reply via email to