On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:09:58AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Marc Matteo wrote:
> >This makes sense, but it leads to a question for me for the port
> >masters: In this case, atk will work with the newer lib version, so is
> >there a way to mark the port to allow this?
>
> 1. pkg_add -u complained about the following (updating all packages):
> glib-2.0.600.4
> gmodule-2.0.600.4
> gobject-2.0.600.4
> pango-1.0.800.1
> pangoft2-1.0.800.1
> t1.5.0
>
> 2. I had these corresponding libs installed:
> lib/libglib-2.0.so.800.3
> lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.800.3
> lib/libgobject-2.0.so.800.3
> lib/libpango-1.0.so.1001.0
> lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.1001.0
> lib/libt1.so.6.0
>
> 3. library-specs(7) says:
> The package system will embed correct dependency checks in the
> built package, according to the normal shared library semantics:
> any library with the same major number, and a greater or equal
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> minor number will do.
>
> Thus, as far as I can see, all of these should have been identified.
no, the major number is not the same (800 vs 600).
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
