> ./devel/p5-Class-Accessor > > - We already have it, please as maintainer to update this port or > send us (and him too) an update
I think this may have been one of the ports sam and I discussed me taking over. > ./devel/p5-Module-Build > > - We already have it, please as maintainer to update this port or > send us (and him too) an update This doesn't even pass it's own regression tests. There are issues surrounding an update to p5-Module-Build. Issues that involve not only changing /usr/ports/infrastructre/mk/perl.port.mk, but one issue that (I may be mixing this up with some other perl module) involves importing perl 5.8.7. It's been a while and I don't remember all of the details. I really need to test this heavily. I will post again soon regarding this update. Is this update 100% necessary for your port ? > ./www/p5-Catalyst > > - Running regression tests give me this: > > [...] > 2 tests skipped. > Failed 23/25 test scripts, 8.00% okay. 360/360 subtests failed, 0.00% okay. After having tested a few of these ports it is obvious the author of the ports has not bothered to check that his ports pass regress. Making the regression tests pass is not optional, it is a REQUIREMENT. -- Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
