ngraham added a comment.
It's a bit frustrating to spend a lot of time in the phab task (T9658 <https://phabricator.kde.org/T9658>) getting consensus on a design, implement it, and then hear, "no, no, major elements of this design needs to be rethought." I understand that sometimes implementation reveals issues that were unforeseen during the original discussion, but let's keep the discussion in T9658 <https://phabricator.kde.org/T9658> or else it will be very hard to follow scattered in two places. @rooty and @filipf, can you re-post your comments in T9658 <https://phabricator.kde.org/T9658> and delete them here? REPOSITORY R120 Plasma Workspace REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16031 To: ngraham, #vdg, #plasma Cc: filipf, rooty, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
