----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125802/#review87404 -----------------------------------------------------------
+1, looks good to me. Let's give it some time for other devs to also have a look at it. - Martin Gräßlin On Oct. 26, 2015, 9:11 a.m., Bhushan Shah wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125802/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 26, 2015, 9:11 a.m.) > > > Review request for Plasma and Martin Gräßlin. > > > Repository: plasma-workspace > > > Description > ------- > > Advantage of this split is some parts such as showLockWindow and > hideLockWindow needs platform specific code. So instead of doing complex > if/else branching we can have seperate X11Locker and WaylandLocker. > > > Diffs > ----- > > ksmserver/screenlocker/CMakeLists.txt 24a89f6 > ksmserver/screenlocker/abstractlocker.h PRE-CREATION > ksmserver/screenlocker/abstractlocker.cpp PRE-CREATION > ksmserver/screenlocker/autotests/CMakeLists.txt ab901ca > ksmserver/screenlocker/autotests/lockwindowtest.cpp 444c44f > ksmserver/screenlocker/autotests/x11lockertest.cpp PRE-CREATION > ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.h b281ab6 > ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.cpp 68ebfc2 > ksmserver/screenlocker/lockwindow.h c4013be > ksmserver/screenlocker/lockwindow.cpp e46733e > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125802/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > builds, installs, autotests and kscreenlocker_test passes, normal lockscreen > also works. > > > Thanks, > > Bhushan Shah > >
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
