> On May 7, 2014, 5:41 p.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I think this should go into the plasma-desktop repository, under kcms/ 
> > (there's already more ksmserver kcm code there).
> > 
> > The spinboxes, I don't find overly useful. Perhaps a combobox with some 
> > default values to pick from? (Users that absolutely need per-second 
> > granularity for grace and idle times may edit the config file, IMO.)
> > 
> > The name could be improved, see comment below. The Comment, I'm not quite 
> > sure about, I don't really like the "configure" bit in there, and it seems 
> > kind of heavy (it's used as title at the top). Maybe something like 
> > "Timeouts for Screen Locking"? It's clear from the context that it's about 
> > "configuration". I'm mulling over the same right now in the new Formats 
> > (locale) KCM, btw.
> > 
> > Otherwise, it looks nice and clean to me.
plasma-desktop doesn't make much sense coding wise. It's using the kcfg file 
which is part of the screenlocker/kcfg directory. I think that would just add 
strange build dependencies if it goes to a different repository.

Concerning UI: I do not want to do any specific code which cannot map to kcfg. 
I see this as a temporary solution as we are late in the cycle and need 
something. I think the better approach will be to expose the settings from the 
lock screen once we have it plasma-fied (corona, etc.). But that's post .0 task.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/#review57503
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 7, 2014, 5:17 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 7, 2014, 5:17 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma and Thomas Pfeiffer.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Bring back a KCM for the screen locker
> 
> Note: I will improve the default values to get them sane. That needs 
> adjustements in the screenlocker source base and I want to get the review of 
> the UI started earlier.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/CMakeLists.txt 
> 3407ea46d5046f2f5b2e7321d714ad1e65ffceea 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/kcm/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/kcm/kcm.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/kcm/kcm.ui PRE-CREATION 
>   ksmserver/screenlocker/kcm/screenlocker.desktop PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118038/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> KCM with values
>   
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/05/07/f70f34d6-2c5c-4638-8e43-d9d727fdb7cb__kcm-with-values.png
> KCM without values
>   
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/05/07/89b1ef8e-803f-42fb-b2cb-52b776246598__kcm-without-values.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Gräßlin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to