On Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:56:41 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > > That’s also what I see in the openSuse packages. > > > > So, yes, I got the # wrong .. it’s 3, not 5 currently .. so we’d end up > > with 4 unless we skip it go to 5. Still, the “number used in the name > > doesn’t match the version number of <insert component here>” comment > > remains > > uuh, right, build from master does a so.3.. > hmm, wonder where the 4 is gone, if was ever "decided" or just done by > mistake... > so do we go for .4 (until we have time?)
Uhm, no, as ervin suggested, the so version should be 5, in line with other frameworks. > > Basically, I’m suggesting that naming the product after the version of the > > software isn’t a necessity and may not even be possible unless we elevate > > one specific component to be the “defining” component, which I don’t think > > we ought to do. > > yes, more and more evident that things like library versions are to be seen > as a small implementation detail and indeed not affect our communication. :) -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
