On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > That’s also what I see in the openSuse packages. > > So, yes, I got the # wrong .. it’s 3, not 5 currently .. so we’d end up > with 4 unless we skip it go to 5. Still, the “number used in the name > doesn’t match the version number of <insert component here>” comment > remains
uuh, right, build from master does a so.3.. hmm, wonder where the 4 is gone, if was ever "decided" or just done by mistake... so do we go for .4 (until we have time?) > Basically, I’m suggesting that naming the product after the version of the > software isn’t a necessity and may not even be possible unless we elevate > one specific component to be the “defining” component, which I don’t think > we ought to do. yes, more and more evident that things like library versions are to be seen as a small implementation detail ;) -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
