On Thursday, May 30, 2013 16:51:16 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > Is the graphic ok that way? Dunno what I could do about the other issue you > mentioned but it has been that for years now and doesn't really matter at > the usual size.
it's not a requirement, just a nice to have. i do notice it at usual sizes even :) but don't worry about it. it's not a regression. > What's missing now before the battery monitor can go into master? > - Discussion about remaining time. the discussion has been had and done a long time ago. nothing left to discuss at this point. > - Once I commit the new battery icon I will remove the overlay and move it > below the icon when not constrained. Settings dialog will then also go. cool... > - I guess needs some testing on RTL layout? Don't know how to test that > though and from what I can tell QML mirrors the anchoring then, so it should > all just work[tm] ? yes, it should Just Work(tm). note that you can test these things by passing the -reverse flag to the application on the command line. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
