On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Marco Martin <notm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday 08 June 2012, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >> 'Plasma' and 'Nepomuk - whatever this means' ? those namings are >> confusing, and if you guys really want a broader audience, you should >> really make it easy for people that are not on your field to use your >> software. I understand that technologies must have a name, I'm also an >> scientist after all, but you will not see a thing about >> paleobathymetry or stratigraphy in anything that I write if the focus >> is people outside of my area of knowledge. > > yep, she's right. actually SC was never a name to be targetted to the public. > > same thing for names of tecnologies (there should be advertized as developer > tools but never to the end user) so in the ui should never ever appear > nepomuk, phonon or akonadi for instance. > > different discourse for products that are directly in front of the user: > "plasma desktop" or "amarok" or "gwenview" are more like microsoft word, iOS > or iTunes > > Cheers, > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Well many of us probably still see Plasma as a technology. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
