[Damn. Just when I say I am out of this discussion, a message arrives I feel the urge to answer.]
Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 14:31:08 Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > it would be like saying that Calligra, Amarok and Digikam are somehow of a > different class compared to KMail because KMail is in the SC. that is not > how we've been dealing with applications for years now. [snip] > if we look at the technical artifacts, it is apparent that Plasma Active is > one of the KDE Workspaces, on equal terms to Plasma Desktop and Plasma > Netbook (and vice versa), and that work on one improves the others. I would like to clear one misunderstanding: the fact I placed Plasma Active out of the KDE SC does not mean I consider the product to be a second-class citizen or that I consider it not to be a fully-fledged Plasma workspace. It just means it is released using a different schedule, which is totally fine. Perhaps the "KDE Workspace" box should be named " KDE SC Plasma Workspaces". Aurélien _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
