On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jan Gerrit Marker <jangmar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, >> Is this a possible use for Synchrotron? Web browsers don't adhere to >> the KDE release schedule, there could easily be changes to the >> bookmarks format between KDE releases. > The Konqueror related code can stay in the engine's code as Konqueror changes > its API only with KDE releases. > For the other browsers you're right, but it needs moving the code into > separate classes and libraries if I understood the concept of Synchrotron > correctly. I don't know how to do this. > > Best regards, > Jan Marker
Well, the question is whether you have a separate class for each browser, or a generic plugin-handling class that uses whatever plug-ins the user has installed via Synchrotron. You could probably ship, at the minimum, rekonq and firefox plug-ins (konqueror would probably be built-in as you said). and people could install others if they desire. So the bookmarks manager wouldn't know up-front what plug-ins it has available. It might even be possible to install third-party plug-ins for less-used browsers or older versions of browsers (does Synchrotron also allow installing third-party plugins from opendesktop.org sites?). -Todd _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
