pereira.alex added a comment.

  In D28057#645164 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D28057#645164>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > I would give each view mode its own config value and adjust the code with 
conditionals; that's not a problem. There are no backwards compatibility 
concerns here if you do that, except for people currently using list view with 
gigantic icons, which will become small, fixing the bug. If they complain, we 
can just tell them that it was a bug and if they want huge list icons again, 
they'll have to configure them that way deliberately. :)
  >
  > Alternatively we can give up on allowing the icon size in list view to be 
configured and just always use a small size.
  
  
  Sorry, maybe i didn't explain it very well: that was like I had previously, 
but in that way, it would actually not fix the bug. the bug is that the rest of 
the plasmoid relies on a default size value. ( which I believe was the original 
bug report and what I wanted to fix ).
  
  Maybe its just coding styles/schools, but I honestly think its better this 
way, update the size when configuring and then use default size everywhere, 
than adding bunch of conditions through out the code, being error prone.
  
  but well, if it must be so... then ok

REPOSITORY
  R119 Plasma Desktop

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D28057

To: pereira.alex, #plasma, #vdg, ngraham
Cc: ngraham, plasma-devel, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, 
jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, 
ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart

Reply via email to