broulik added a comment.
> The CHANGELOG keyword is cumbersome to use because the summary line most often already tells sufficiently what the commit is about. So it would only be a repetition of what is already written. Besides why should we want to have a disparity between changelog and commit log anyway? I use the CHANGELOG tag quite often. The difference being that the summary is perhaps something like "Avoid null pointer dereference" with CHANGELOG being a more friendly line for the changelog "Fix crash when doing xyz". REPOSITORY R104 KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D24068 To: romangg, #plasma Cc: broulik, ngraham, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
