2008/10/28 Kevin Ottens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Le Tuesday 28 October 2008, Marco Martin a écrit : >> seriously tough, the only problem i perhaps see with webview is that it >> would suggest that as the other widgets is a proxywidget of QWebView, that >> is not since it uses directly QWebPage, so nativeWidget() will never return >> anything meaningful.. > > That's not a big issue IMO since the target users for our API will probably > never use nativeWidget() anyway. > > My idea is more that QWebView is a view you can use for a QWebPage, > Plasma::WebView is another. > >> perhaps we could call it WebPage or WebPageWidget or something like this > > WebPage would be even more confusing IMO, because then you have a setPage() > method which takes a QWebPage as argument. > > WebPageWidget would not be confusing, it just lacks accuracy IMO. "Widget" is > kind of generic while here it's clearly a view onto something. Also it's kind > of long for no real extra information.
How about Plasma::WebItem ? It fits with the naming for canvas thingies and is somewhat familiar. I suppose the issue is that it is still ambiguous... what exactly would a web item be. > > Regards. > -- > Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net > "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, > Ne font reculer l'ignorance." > > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > Plasma-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel > > _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
