Le Tuesday 28 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : > the most dubious imho is WebContent -> > WebView, which must mean it's pretty good. i do prefer WebContent since > that's, well, what it is. it would be like calling Plasma::Label a > Plasma::TextView ;)
Ah right forgot this one, Plasma::Label should probably be Plasma::TextView indeed... Kidding of course. So, what should I do with WebContent then? My idea was really consistency with Qt on this one (you know learnability and upgrade path), it's an alternative to QWebView IMO. > anyways, thanks for taking this on... look forwrd to the patches hitting > svn. it'll give me something to look forward to building in between boring > meetings =P It'll be done ASAP... Means "probably not before tonight" though... Regards. -- Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net "Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître, Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
