On Thursday 09 October 2008, Guillaume Pothier wrote: > 2008/10/9 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > we store the arrangement of panels and resize the views, but we don't > > mess with the layouts. that seems a bit overkill. if you want different > > layouts, perhaps use different Activities. > > Maybe there could be an automatic switching of activities based on > current monitor config?
not without user intervention; which means more configuration UI to wade through .. is there really a serious use case for this? > > what would be the benefit of putting all the configuration data together > > in this case? > > Just to avoid having to maintain another mapping of <monitors config > -> config data>, as kephal already has such a mapping. we already map the screen # and screen size. unless there's a common use case where massive rearrangement of the monitors is a commonplace action, i don't see the need to change the current code or make it more complex than it already is. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
