On Thursday 09 October 2008, Guillaume Pothier wrote: > I guess the right thing to do would be to listen to kephal signals > instead of QDesktopWidget ones?
once kephal is available, yes. > How would communication work in that case? dbus? i assume so, yes. > Anyway, I'll re-apply the workaround patch I sent before, to see if it > is still useful (it reconfigured all the screens instead of > reconfiguring only one when adjustSize was called). If it works, it > might be a good idea to include it until a kephal is moved out of > playground. i guess that brings us back to the real question: is kephal going to make it for 4.2? if so, let's not spend our time on workarounds, but on getting kephal and plasma working together. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
