El 11/09/25 a las 09:40, Santiago Ruano Rincón escribió: ... > Other than re-adding 17 to the exec script, I hope this dep-8 test could > help to identify this regression in the future: > > diff --git a/debian/tests/control b/debian/tests/control > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..70ce2f08 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/tests/control > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +Tests: detect-openjdk-17 > +Depends: @, openjdk-17-jre > diff --git a/debian/tests/detect-openjdk-17 b/debian/tests/detect-openjdk-17 > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..5fd57d3d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/debian/tests/detect-openjdk-17 > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > + > +sh /usr/libexec/tomcat9/tomcat-locate-java.sh > > Currently testing in my tomcat9's fork. I'll report if this doesn't work > as expected.
Well, I am reporting despite it seems to work: https://salsa.debian.org/santiago/tomcat9/-/jobs/8259632 For being able to trigger a pipeline in salsa, you need to enable the CI, configuring it the bullseye's recipe. And uploading via debusine.d.n would also trigger the autopkgtest tasks. HTH, -- S __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
