On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 10:54:09 -0300 Santiago Ruano =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rinc=F3n?= <[email protected]> wrote: > Source: tomcat9 > Version: 9.0.107-0+deb11u1 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > Hello Markus, > > tomcat9 9.0.107-0+deb11u1 removed the changed made by 9.0.43-2_deb11u5 > in debian/libexec/tomcat-locate-java.sh that looks up for OpenJDK 17. > The same change (included below) obviously solves the regression. > > I wonder if #1110075 relates to this change.
I agree that the removal of version 17 from the exec script was not intentional. However that would not explain the other errors the user reported in #1110075. There would have been different reports already if the startup of the server was a general problem. In bullseye openjdk-11 is the default-jre, which is also the version the package was tested against during its development cycle. I believe we should re-add 17 to the exec script and fix this issue with a regression update but I can't close #1110075 without further information.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use [email protected] for discussions and questions.
