On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Siarhei Siamashka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:04:35 +0300 > Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 14:40:47 +0300 >> Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > From: Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > this is the second iteration, with the C fast path patch dropped. The >> > remaining >> > patches are identical to the previous submission, except they have been >> > re-benchmarked, just in case. >> > >> > Explanation for this patch submission style was given in the previous >> > series: >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-August/003855.html >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > pq >> > >> > Ben Avison (1): >> > armv6: Add over_n_8888 fast path (disabled) >> > >> > Pekka Paalanen (1): >> > armv6: enable over_n_8888 >> > >> > pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.S | 41 >> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > pixman/pixman-arm-simd.c | 6 ++++++ >> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+) >> > >> >> Pushed: >> 4c71f59..73e586e master -> master > > Well, nothing bad has really happened yet. But probably it would be > great to give at least a 2 days notice before pushing patches, unless > they had been actually reviewed by somebody. > > -- > Best regards, > Siarhei Siamashka > _______________________________________________ > Pixman mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
I thought that Ben wrote the patch and Pekka reviewed it, no ? _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
