On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:04:35 +0300
Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon,  7 Sep 2015 14:40:47 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this is the second iteration, with the C fast path patch dropped. The 
> > remaining
> > patches are identical to the previous submission, except they have been
> > re-benchmarked, just in case.
> > 
> > Explanation for this patch submission style was given in the previous 
> > series:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2015-August/003855.html
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > pq
> > 
> > Ben Avison (1):
> >   armv6: Add over_n_8888 fast path (disabled)
> > 
> > Pekka Paalanen (1):
> >   armv6: enable over_n_8888
> > 
> >  pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.S | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  pixman/pixman-arm-simd.c     |  6 ++++++
> >  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> Pushed:
>    4c71f59..73e586e  master -> master

Well, nothing bad has really happened yet. But probably it would be
great to give at least a 2 days notice before pushing patches, unless
they had been actually reviewed by somebody.

-- 
Best regards,
Siarhei Siamashka
_______________________________________________
Pixman mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman

Reply via email to