* Thus wrote Manuel Lemos:
> Hello,
>
> On 07/19/2004 12:32 AM, Curt Zirzow wrote:
> >
> >Ok so a lot of bugs have been submited, and I do notice that they
> >are either green or gray. Of which, in case you didn't read the
> >legend. green == CLOSED (aka resolved and fixed!!!) gray == bogus.
> >meaning the person was using the function improperly.
> >
> >One is currently assigned and is related to W32 with a 'rcpt to'
> >issue. The other *only* open one is complaining that the 5th
> >argument isn't working, and if you *look* closely at that open
> >ticket, I'm currently working with him to make sure it isn't a bug
> >with php.
>
> Even if no open bugs means that the mail function of the latest PHP
> version does not have any bugs, it does not mean that all users are
> using the latest version.
And again (for the third time), you have no idea what version the
person is using.
>
> As I explained before, it is not necessary to know in advance the
> version that the person is using to state by the presented sympthoms
> that the problem may be due to bugs in the mail function, present or
> past (it does not matter).
Ok. let see.. mail('foo;bar;qoo', 'blah', 'blah');
mail functionality doesn't work.. you say its because of a possible
bug of mail()... NOT. and as I perfectly explained, ';' is not a
valid seperator for addresses.
> Another detail is that you are distorting what I say. Saying that it
> "sounds like a PHP mail function bug", is not the same as claiming "it
> is a PHP mail function bug". If you want to be taken with credibility,
> stop distorting what I say.
ok.. s/claiming/strongly implying/
> >
> >>Hey, you are a PEAR zealot! Now it makes all the sense of the world that
> >>you do not want me to lead people to the PHP Classes site. It seems you
> >>are one of those people that think of the PHP Classes site as a
> >>competitor of PEAR. I would not be surprised if you would enjoy if one
> >>day the PHP Classes site was shutdown so PEAR did not have any
> >>competitors!
> >
> >
> >Let me count how many packages i'm a maintainer of... lets see.. 0
> >+ 0 makes ZERO!
>
> Which is not a necessary condition to be a PEAR zealot.
You better do your research, if you still are thinking I'm a zealot
of pear than your are sadly mistaken.
If you would actually take some time out and read the posts I send
to this list you just might realize how wrong you are.
>
> >Ok. now you are *trying* to attack me personally. Why don't you
>
> No, I am not. If you insisting view it that way to justify subsequent
> personal attacks directed to me, that is going to be your problem
> because I am not going to follow (un)justified attack tone.
Haha.. take my text out of context to make me look evil.. how
clever.
<original quote>
Ok. now you are *trying* to attack me personally. Why don't you
look at all the google results to php-general and see how many
...
</original quote>
> >look at all the google results to php-general and see how many
> >times you've seen me suggest PEAR as a solution. You will simply
> >find that I have suggested PEAR mabey 1 or 2 times out of the 3000 or
> >so posts on php-general.
>
> Come on, you are not convincing anybody here. It is not a problem to be
> a PEAR zealot to me.
You're definition of zealot is really wired.
> >
> >read above. about how I am not at all affiliated with PEAR.
>
> Please, do not pretend now that your complaint was not directed to my
> recommendation of classes in the PHP Classes.
have you read anything I wrote? My complaint is about your quick
assumption about php mail() having a bug. The rest is in defense of
your claim^H^H^H^H strongly implying I'm a pear zealot.
> >
> >
> >Again, I dont and never use PEAR. I've been here for quite a
> >while and rarely have suggested to any one PEAR.
> >
> >...
>
> Erm... you have admited below that you recommended PEAR packages. Now
> you say that you never use PEAR. So you are saying you recommend PEAR
> packages that never used and you want us to think that you are not a
> PEAR zealot? humm... I am afraid that it is a little difficult now.
Am I unable to recomend a package that other people have recomended
to me? *I* dont use pear. I have suggested pear *once or twice* on
this list. You're insistance of my zeolous of PEAR is just plain
out stupid.
>
> Anyway, you must admit that you were the one that complained about my
> recommendations of things that are found on my site. Even if you can
> convince us that your really not a PEAR zealot, complaining about my
> recommendations to use something on my site is a pattern of behavior of
> PEAR zealots that once in a while pop in to do as you did.
<quote me>
> >>>what ever you are trying to say about it being a bug or not, it is
> >>>one of the worst ways i've ever seen anyone try to plug their site.
</quote me>
I never once ever did complaing about your recomendation of your
site. I only suggested that you're aproach on promoting your site
was wrong.
pop in? where have you been?
Curt
--
First, let me assure you that this is not one of those shady pyramid schemes
you've been hearing about. No, sir. Our model is the trapezoid!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
