* Thus wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This is a very busy list, over 100 message in a quiet day and most
> > people  are helpful and decent, don't mind reading and learning.
> > Unfortunately  there are some who mostly post stuff like 'read the
> > manual' and other shit  like that. Stuffing e-mailboxes with such
> > garbage day after day doesn't do  anybody any good even if the manual
> > is  not being read as much as it should  be. Is it too difficult to not
> > answer the post at all if you disagree with  the content?
> >
> >
> > Andu
> >
> > --
> 
> good on you , i'm sick and tired of twats replying with i dont understand
> your question or RTFM , i absolutely "hate" RTFM , the idea of the list is
> to help eachother out and even post back to the list the completed code
> someone was stuck on to share with everyone , if there is no decent asnwer
> to reply with dont reply at all

Calling someone a twat is not going to persuade anybody to change
how you think a proper reply should be.

If I dont understand someone's question, should I not let them know
that if that make themselves a little clearer a better answer may
be given instead of 12 people shooting in the dark giving answers
to problems that are not the issue the person is having?


: skips comment on RTFM :)

Yes the list is about helping people out, but we (those who help
people) arn't here to write someone elses code.  If and when that
is done people become too lazy and rely on the list to have their
problems solved, instead of the user doing research himself to
find out if this is a common problem.

Like for example, when people are asking for examples a simple
google search for '<functionname>' example', usually results with
some good examples.

cheers,

Curt
-- 
"I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure."

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to