> > While looking at something nearby, I noticed a naming inconsistency for > > the parameter name in LWLockNewTrancheId(). It should be tranche_name, > > similar to RequestNamedLWLockTranche(), and in other places it's > > referenced in the docs/comments. > > I don't mind changing it, but I don't find "tranche_name" to be > substantially better than "name" in this case.
It's just a matter of consistency and it's more descriptive to the caller, IMO. -- Sami Imseih Amazon Web Services (AWS)
