Kirill Reshke <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 at 18:31, David G. Johnston
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Listing commands described as being “present for historical reasons” in the
>> documentation seems unnecessary. We don’t list abort in the “See Also”
>> section either.
> I bumped into specific behaviour of COMMIT in an already-broken
> transaction yet again recently. So, I moved CF entry to the next CF,
> hope this will get eventually merged.
> LGTM
Pushed with minor emendations.
I'm not quite sure why we describe ABORT as quasi-deprecated but not
BEGIN; neither of them are in the standard. I'm disinclined to touch
that state of affairs though.
regards, tom lane
