On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 11:14:24PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> philophers -> philosophers
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
> ---
> Re-reading, found a typo accidentally. :)
;-) ;-) ;-)
Good eyes, applied, and thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> index 246182c2..0d94ec3a 100644
> --- a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> +++ b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
> @@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ The word ``design'' is very important:
> You should partition first, batch second, weaken third, and code fourth.
> Changing this order often leads to poor performance and scalability
> along with great frustration.\footnote{
> That other great dodge around the Laws of Physics, read-only
> replication, is covered in \cref{chp:Deferred Processing}.}
>
> This chapter will also look at some specific problems, including:
>
> \begin{enumerate}
> \item Constraints on the classic Dining Philosophers problem requiring
> - that all the philophers be able to dine concurrently.
> + that all the philosophers be able to dine concurrently.
> \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Dining Philosophers}
> \item Lock-based double-ended queue implementations that provide
> concurrency between operations on both ends of a given queue
> when there are many elements in the queue, but still work
> correctly when the queue contains only a few elements.
> (Or, for that matter, no elements.)
> \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Double-Ended Queue}
> \item Summarizing the rough quality of a concurrent algorithm with
> only
> a few numbers.
> \label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Quality Assessment}
> --
> 2.53.0
>
