philophers -> philosophers
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <[email protected]>
---
Re-reading, found a typo accidentally. :)
SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
index 246182c2..0d94ec3a 100644
--- a/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
+++ b/SMPdesign/SMPdesign.tex
@@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ The word ``design'' is very important:
You should partition first, batch second, weaken third, and code fourth.
Changing this order often leads to poor performance and scalability
along with great frustration.\footnote{
That other great dodge around the Laws of Physics, read-only
replication, is covered in \cref{chp:Deferred Processing}.}
This chapter will also look at some specific problems, including:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Constraints on the classic Dining Philosophers problem requiring
- that all the philophers be able to dine concurrently.
+ that all the philosophers be able to dine concurrently.
\label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Dining Philosophers}
\item Lock-based double-ended queue implementations that provide
concurrency between operations on both ends of a given queue
when there are many elements in the queue, but still work
correctly when the queue contains only a few elements.
(Or, for that matter, no elements.)
\label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Double-Ended Queue}
\item Summarizing the rough quality of a concurrent algorithm with only
a few numbers.
\label{sec:SMPdesign:Problems Quality Assessment}
--
2.53.0
