On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 05:13:32PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > Hello, > > please do not use html mail for mailing lists. Especially if the > plain/text alternatie is empty. Below you can see what the mail looks > like in mutt. Thanks! > > The copying semantics of the RC (and CD) bits are described in
make that RD > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6895 > > In general 1034 and 1035 only cover the basics. Large parts of their > content has been superseded, clarified, extended and what not in other > RFCs. https://powerdns.org/dns-camel gives an overview of all DNS > related RFCs. > > Reading them is already a huge tasks. Let alone completely > understanding and implementing them. > > I believe everybody involved would be better of if you just use one of > the available authoratative servers. Preferably powerdns, of course ;-) > > -Otto > > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:19:47AM +0000, Jørgen Hovland ☁️ wrote: > > > <html><body><div>Hello > > Steinar,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>> if I query without > > the "Recursion Desired" flag, the flag is still set in the > > reply</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for that. Ill remove it.</div><div>(I > > don't see in the RFC that it shouldnt be allowed to include it, but it > > doesnt make any sense)</div><div><br></div><div>> There are multiple > > problems ... https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp</div><div><br></div><div>We > > do not have any plans to implement EDNS today, so I just wanted to make > > sure EDNS-clients don't break compability.</div><div>I was notified that > > rfc6891/edns require format error and empty response when NOT supporting > > EDNS, so it just looked like a catch 22 compared to the original dns rfc > > which got me a bit confused.<br></div><div><br></div><div><pre > > style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; > > font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; > > orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0 > > px; text-transform: none; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; > > -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; > > text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;"> > > <br></pre></div>Jørgen<br><br> > > At 08:08 10/05/2019 (UTC), sth...@nethelp.no wrote:<br> > > <br><meta charset="utf-8">> (I am the author of the mentioned dns > > software)<br> > > ><br> > > > According to RFC1034, including the request in the response seem to > > be<br> > > > required. Is there something I am misunderstanding here ?<br> > > <br> > > There are multiple problems with p4.no, and you can see it with the<br> > > ISC EDNS compliance tester:<br> > > <br> > > https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp<br> > > <br> > > Note that there are more problems than those related to EDNS handling.<br> > > For instance, if I query without the "Recursion Desired" flag, the flag<br> > > is still set in the reply, which shouldn't happen:<br> > > <br> > > % dig +norec +noad +noedns soa p4.no @213.179.58.78<br> > > ..<br> > > ;; Got answer:<br> > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45201<br> > > ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 5<br> > > <br> > > This is the first test that the ISC EDNS compliance tester shows as<br> > > failing for p4.no.<br> > > <br> > > Steinar Haug, AS2116<br> > > <br> > > </body></html> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pdns-users mailing list > > Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > > https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users > > _______________________________________________ > Pdns-users mailing list > Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
