> (I am the author of the mentioned dns software)
>
> According to RFC1034, including the request in the response seem to be
> required. Is there something I am misunderstanding here ?
There are multiple problems with p4.no, and you can see it with the
ISC EDNS compliance tester:
https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp
Note that there are more problems than those related to EDNS handling.
For instance, if I query without the "Recursion Desired" flag, the flag
is still set in the reply, which shouldn't happen:
% dig +norec +noad +noedns soa p4.no @213.179.58.78
...
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45201
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 5
This is the first test that the ISC EDNS compliance tester shows as
failing for p4.no.
Steinar Haug, AS2116
_______________________________________________
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
