Bill, thanks for the extensive description of your setup! And thanks to Ralf 
for his question! 
When I read your first post and did a quick look at the image of your setup, my 
first question was “what light source?” I hadn’t expected something quite so 
elaborate, but totally understand the concept. 
I have tried doing some 35mm film  and slide scanning via 
camera-on-a-copy-stand, macro lens, using a light-box for light source. Never 
satisfactory, the lighting just too uneven across the frame.

Stan

> On Aug 1, 2025, at 3:30 PM, Bill <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ralf, so I built a box and painted the inside white:
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/2ri4DVh
> 
> The hole at the bottom of the box is for the light source, in this case a 
> high CRI wafer light from a local lighting specialty supplier. The two cleats 
> attached to the sides are for the diffuser material. I had a bunch of semi 
> translucent sign plastic sitting around. Four layers of it was sufficient, 
> but I decided to separate them into two layers of two for no reason other 
> than I thought it was a good idea.
> 
> This is the box with the light source. It's a 6" 90CRI 1400 lumen wafer light 
> normally used as a home ceiling light. It's one of those switchable among 
> many hues, I set it to 5000k.
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/2rhXGtn
> 
> And this has the diffusers installed. I cut the sheets to fit, taped them 
> together and then held them in with thin slats and pin nails.
> 
> This is an overview of the box waiting for the top to be installed.
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/2ri2YyE
> 
> The top with a 4x5 neg carrier.
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/2ri4ck2
> 
> The finished product sitting on the floor of my messy workshop
> 
> https://flic.kr/p/2ri4DVC
> 
> The camera support was pirated from an old copy stand that I bought when I 
> was a teenager, so I've had it around for some 50 years. I purpose bought it 
> and put it away after that, so it's nice to have finally found a use for it 
> again.
> 
> I mounted the camera support on a cleat that I cut oversized slots into. The 
> cleat is held to the table with 3/8 inch carriage bolts, the slots allow 
> lateral movement and they are wide enough to allow forward/backward motion to 
> allow the entire camera platform to be moved to allow the camera to be 
> centered on the film. Once in place, wingnuts are tightened down to keep it 
> from shifting.
> 
> The black round thing in the picture is a Beseler 4x5 inch negative carrier.
> 
> For my medium and large format negs I am using the Fuji pixel shift feature. 
> It works somewhat like the Pentax emulation, but because of the X-Trans 
> sensor it takes 20 exposures per finished frame rather than 4.
> 
> The 20 frames are not combined in camera, unlike Pentax. Combining is done in 
> the computer using Fuji supplied software.
> 
> In operation, I have the camera tethered to the computer. I put a neg into 
> the carrier and push the button on the Fuji software so that I am not near 
> the camera. If there is even the slightest movement the combiner job will 
> fail. I tried using a wired release, but was getting a high failure rate. 
> Using the software to start the exposure is working better.
> 
> So, the software imports the files to a directory, combines them and outputs 
> the finished 140mp file to another directory which is set as a watched 
> directory in Lightroom.
> 
> I expect for 35mm film I won't bother with the super resolution feature but 
> will, instead use the pixel shift in what Fuji calls accurate colour mode 
> where it outputs a 40mp file.
> 
> When the combined file appears, Lightroom grabs it and moves and imports it 
> to where I want it stored and adds it to the catalogue.
> 
> It's really slick and I can copy 3 4x5 negs per minute, or thereabouts.
> 
> bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/1/2025 10:58 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>> Am 01.08.25 um 16:39 schrieb Bill:
>>> So, I built myself a film scanning station based around the Fuji X-T5. You 
>>> can see what it looks like here:
>>> 
>>> https://flic.kr/p/2rimmKZ
>> 
>> Sounds interesting. But what is the light source and I see no such thing as 
>> a negative carrier.
>> 
>> Ralf
>> 
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to