Well said, Godfrey.
I well remember a heated argument I had with a fellow teacher along
those lines many years ago. He was adamant that photography could never
be art. One could even argue about the type of brush & paint used! And
what if the "artist" had to wear glasses?
Alan C
On 22-Jan-23 04:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you want to put a simple limitation on "what is art" to say that it must be made by
human hands, well, that is just fine … but most photographs will then be marginally not-art since
we already rely upon a whole range of machines, of varying levels of "intelligence", to
produce our photographs.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.