Nothing objectionable with the ‘noise’ in that image. Nice catch Larry.
I suspect part of the success regarding ‘noise’ in that image is the overall brightness to start with. If the overall lighting were darker the noise might become objectionable in the processing trying to bring the detail. -----Original Message----- >From: Larry Colen <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: PESOs For the Birds > > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 8:56 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Paul. >> I recently started shooting in the TAV mode myself and am looking to find an >> acceptabvle max ISO to shoot with. > >I have found that when pushing the performance envelope I’m less likely to >completely lose a shot due to too high an ISO than I am to too low of a >shutter speed. > >Here’s one with my K-5, which I was surprised to note after the fact was at >ISO 10,000. To me, the noise looks on par with the grain from Tri-X. > >http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/9313464692/ > >full set >http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157634684347823 > >Another time I was photographing some friends on stage, and in post processing >I noticed that one of the frames as a bit noisy, then I realized that it was >at ISO 25,600 >https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8366084507/ > >full set: >http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157632485855236 > >In short, my feeling is lean on your shutter speed and aperture as hard as you >feel safe, and take what ISO you get. If the final result is too noisy to be >usable, chances are you would have lost it with a slower shutter speed. > > >-- >Larry Colen >[email protected] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
