Mark, LED panels sold for video use should not flicker.

Have you tried CFLs yet? They /may/ not flicker because of the decay
time in the fluorescent coating.

Perhaps rearrange your schedule to shoot during the day and use sunlight? :)


On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote:
> A couple things I learned about the K-1 and Pixel Shift Mode:
>
> The banding I was experiencing is the result of the electronic shutter and
> artificial light. It's just a rolling shutter effect. I saw it in Pixel
> Shift mode since that uses the electronic shutter, but setting the camera to
> use the electronic shutter in standard resolution / live view mode will also
> produce the banding. With the incandescent bulbs I used in the test, the
> banding was worse at higher shutter speeds but seemed to disappear at speeds
> of 1/15th or slower. Here's an extreme example - pointed the camera directly
> at a 30W mini flood light and shot at 1/8000 / f2.8:
>
> http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/pentax-k-1-banding?blog=9
>
> So, I have to figure out some form of lighting that will not cause banding.
> The incandescent bulbs that I tried seem to be the worst offenders, so I'll
> go back to LED's. I was thinking that DC powered LED's would not flicker,
> but testing that theory on some DC powered led's in the house showed that
> they do. I do have some led flashlights that do not produce banding. And
> there's an old propane lantern around here somewhere...
>
> The other thing that I learned (which is actually rather embarrassing) is
> that I had not actually seen any pixel shift results till today. I'm using
> PS CS6 and ACR 9.1.1. K-1 DNG raw files open just fine in ACR 9.1.1 but the
> pixel-shift magic does not happen. Apparently you need ACR 9.5 or higher
> before the pixel shift enhancement takes place. Compared to in-camera JPGs
> or DNG's processed in silky pix, the difference is very clear. So while I
> was impressed with the results I was getting with the K-1, all I was seeing
> was the improvement inherent in the sensor itself and not pixel shift
> resolution.
>
> ACR 9.1.1 is the last release that works with Photoshop CS6, so I either
> have to update, start using SilkyPix or shoot JPG's.  I just figured out how
> to do batch processing in SilkyPix and will use that for the time being.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to