It was an experiment, trying to come up with a different presentation of a familiar subject. Looks like it didn't work for you. Thanks for commenting!
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Under water? OK, I didn't recognize that was the case. > Thanks for the explanation. However, knowing this doesn't help my > appreciation of the image. > > Jack > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Attila Boros" <[email protected]> > To: "PDML" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 11:18:06 AM > Subject: Re: PESO: Rocks > > Sorry for the misunderstanding. The dark area is under water, and > further away from the rocks in the foreground. I wanted to divide the > frame like this, one part clearly visible, the other part darker and > less defined. You should be able to see the rocks there, but with less > texture. > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Attila, what I intended, was that I would have liked to be able to better >> make out some detail pretty much over the entire frame. >> The large dark area (at least on my monitor) completely disallows me to >> appreciate what I suspect is there. >> >> Jack > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
