I agree . Some of my best prints were made from istD images. Hard to see a difference between those 6 megapixel pics and today's 16 megapixel k5 photos. But I will buy the new camera so I can retire my backup, a noisy k7.
Paul via phone > On Sep 22, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote: > > Resolution is important for images the need high resolution. IMO, most images > don't. Depends on the subject matter and the intent of the photo. Again, my > opinion, but most images will benefit first from lack of noise and sharp > edges (acutance) and than from increased resolution. But people have been > trained to want more of what-ever and so focus on things that can be measured > and and quantified as "more" because then the marketers can trot out a new > thing and say "See - it's got more!" > > So bring on the megapixels, Jack! > > Mark > > > >> On 9/22/2013 1:56 PM, steve harley wrote: >> >> resolution doesn't scale linearly with the number of pixels; with perfect >> lenses and sensors, it scales with the square root of the number of pixels; >> then you add the real world factors > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
