There is a rumor the sensor can move around and the camera can combine
the resulting shots into a higher MP image as well. How this works
with APS-C designed lenses with a tight circle I have no idea, but I
guess we shall see if this rumor is correct.

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
> 33% more resolution and no AA filter? That's a big step up from the
> k-5 on paper. We shall have to see what noise and DR looks like.
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, David J Brooks <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Zos Xavius <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2013/09/latest-k-3-technical-details-from-my.html
>>>
>>> It sounds like an announcement is right around the corner. Photorumors
>>> source says 20mp. Rice High's source says 24mp. I'm gonna take a wild
>>> shot and bet on 24mp as 20mp is not competitive with the D7100.
>>
>> Still nothing to get me excited to upgrade from my K-5
>>
>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 21, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brian Walters <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Quoting "P.J. Alling" <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricoh used to make a line of second string K mount SLRs, prior to that 
>>>>>> they made a line of second string m42 mount SLRs, and apparently they 
>>>>>> marketed a Nikon mount SLR, made by Mamiym.  They put some pretty nice 
>>>>>> technology into them, often the K mount bodies seemed to have somewhat 
>>>>>> better tech and more features than Pentax, and they were pretty nice 
>>>>>> cameras, but there was always something off about their ergonomics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Back when Pentax still had a presence in most Cameras stores, (not that 
>>>>>> long ago actually), one of the best local camera stores in the area went 
>>>>>> out of business, (they had one of my LXen in for repair, and I was 
>>>>>> worried about getting it back, I did eventually), at their going out of 
>>>>>> business sale they had a used Ricoh, I forget the model number, it 
>>>>>> resembled a Pentax A3 but included a ME Super style button system for 
>>>>>> setting manual shutter speeds IIRC.  This particular camera seemed to be 
>>>>>> pristine condition and the price was certainly right, I was seriously 
>>>>>> considering buying it as a body to carry where I didn't want to risk a 
>>>>>> LX or MX, when one of the buttons simply fell off.  The salesman who I 
>>>>>> knew, (it wasn't a paid liquidator running the sale), said, "That seems 
>>>>>> to happen a lot, it just snaps back on." I decided to take a pass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricoh abandoned the SLR market sometime in the 90's.  I don't remember 
>>>>>> when, exactly.  I don't remember any big announcement, such as when 
>>>>>> Yashica stopped making cameras, Ricoh just sort of stopped, making SLRs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a Ricoh XR-2 in the 1970s/80s.  It may have been a second-string 
>>>>> brand but it was an excellent camera - functionally equivalent to the ME 
>>>>> Super in a slightly larger body and without the push buttons.  Sadly, it 
>>>>> was stolen in the mid 80s but, on the positive side, the theft brought me 
>>>>> back to Pentax :-)>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think Ricoh decided not to get involved in the SLR autofocus race.  
>>>>> They continued to make a few manual focus SLRs until the mid 90s before 
>>>>> pulling the plug.
>>>>
>>>> You're probably right. The conversion to AF SLRs was difficult for most 
>>>> manufacturers. Canon was roundly despised by their user base for doing the 
>>>> right thing and obsoleting the FL/FD mount in favor of the EOS mount, 
>>>> which was specifically designed for the future AF and electronic control 
>>>> models. It was/is very successful even today as it is a very large 
>>>> diameter bayonet flange on a relatively short mount register, allowing a 
>>>> smooth conversion to digital capture. Nikon and everyone else without a 
>>>> purpose designed mount flange have struggled a bit.
>>>>
>>>> Ricoh made an excellent line of SLRs. We used to buy them for the student 
>>>> photo staff/camera club when I was in high school as they were less 
>>>> expensive than Pentax and seemed to need service much less often in the 
>>>> hands of a bunch of high school kids.
>>>>
>>>> G
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
>> www.caughtinmotion.com
>> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
>> York Region, Ontario, Canada
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to