On 17/4/13, Mark C, discombobulated, unleashed: >Can't speak regarding other groups, but having been around here for a >while I can say that the complaints about Pentax have remained >essentially unchanged - too far behind the competition wrt upgrades. > >In the late 90's it was the lack of a pro-grade body, poor AF and and >poor metering. (I won't try defining "pro-grade body" - if the archives >go back that far there you can find hundreds of posts that do define >precisely what that means, though they don't always agree with each other.) > >Then it was the angst over the lack of a digital body. > >Now the angst over the lack of full frame.
I beg to differ - I never had any angst at all in buying different gear ;-) -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) | Web Video Producion ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
