On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > It happens all the time. Frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn. People > will think what they want to think, and while it may be useful to help > people overcome their prejudices and see something with a different POV, > there is no need for evangelical fervor in so doing, especially wrt a > camera choice.
I agree; evangelists and fanatics scare the #%$& out of me. Hence the humourous, tongue-in-cheek tone of the P67B posts. Some 35mm guys have responded in kind (the hernia comment was great, Tom!), and it's made for some playful banter back and forth. For me, it's meant as playful teasing, not as any attempt to ridicule 35mm in general. I think those itty-bitty negs allow 35mm to ridicule itself quite adequately without the P67B needing to do anything. :) (Yes, that was a joke... be gentle.) :) chris, P67B > Chris Brogden wrote: > > > If someone starting slamming rangefinders for being > > awful street cameras, but had never taken the time > > to actually use one themselves, what would you think? > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > You can't have everything. Where would you put it? > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
