Aaron Reynolds wrote: > Yep. But it is accepted as the default photojournalist 35. That's the > point I'm trying to make...why is that acceptable to carry around, but > the 67 is insanely gigantic?
It's only acceptable to some people, and in some circumstances. And it does defeat the purpose of a discreet, 35mm camera. My point is that 35mm and 67 are not necessarily interchangeable, especially small, discreet 35mm cameras. While there can be situations where the 67 is a better choice, it is not the best choice in others. Both cameras are, to many photographers, insanely gigantic. If you like the camera, fine, enjoy it, use it to make photographs that suit your style and personality. But please, stop trying to enable everyone on this list to follow the lead of the "Brotherhood". It's becoming tiresome and annoying, and the humor has gone out of it. The horse is dead, stop beating it. We've gotten your message - over and over again. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ You can't have everything. Where would you put it? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
