If it's a general brother hood, are we Yashica Mat users included? :-0 Bill
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jim Apilado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 2:57 PM Subject: Re[2]: 67 Brotherhood > Jim, > > Yeah, I think we are gonna need to broaden the Brotherhood a bit. > Include 645 and need to decide if this is a general brotherhood or a > Pentax brotherhood. > > > Brother Bruce > > > > Monday, February 18, 2002, 10:13:20 AM, you wrote: > > JA> I don't own a 67. Alas, only a couple of 645 Pentaxes. If there is a > JA> Brotherhood of the 67, I wonder how many sit at the 645 Pentax table? > > JA> Jim A. > > >> From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:12:21 -0600 (CST) > >> To: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: 67 Brotherhood > >> > >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote: > >> > >>> Brother Chris, > >>> > >>> I think that you have to get a 67 body - a lens by itself won't cut > >>> it. You have to feel and experience that weight (power!) to become > >>> part of the brotherhood. > >> > >> Alas, Brother Bruce, you misunderstand. I *have* a 67, as well as the > >> 150/2.8, 90/2.8LS, metered finder, waist-level finder, and grip. The lens > >> owing to each of us is no more than your just dues to gain entry to this > >> select and privileged society known only as the Brotherhood. The 45mm > >> will do admirably for my purposes, thank you. > >> > >> Brother Chris > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
