I don't own a 67. Alas, only a couple of 645 Pentaxes. If there is a Brotherhood of the 67, I wonder how many sit at the 645 Pentax table?
Jim A. > From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:12:21 -0600 (CST) > To: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: 67 Brotherhood > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote: > >> Brother Chris, >> >> I think that you have to get a 67 body - a lens by itself won't cut >> it. You have to feel and experience that weight (power!) to become >> part of the brotherhood. > > Alas, Brother Bruce, you misunderstand. I *have* a 67, as well as the > 150/2.8, 90/2.8LS, metered finder, waist-level finder, and grip. The lens > owing to each of us is no more than your just dues to gain entry to this > select and privileged society known only as the Brotherhood. The 45mm > will do admirably for my purposes, thank you. > > Brother Chris > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
