On 8 November 2010 17:25, P N Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > Boris asked me to provide a direct comparison. So here it is. One pic each > of the same scene from each camera, shot off a tripod with the DA* 16-50 at > f5.6, 1/60th. (Both meters agreed on that exposure.) The FOV varies > slightly, because I turned the zoom ring a bit when removing the lens from > camera one. The K-7 pic is 22mm, the K-5 is 21mm. In addition to one shot > from each, I've combined the two images for direct viewing of both at once. > I've sized the jpegs slightly larger than my normal web pics for better > detail viewing. Both are raws, converted with the default settings of my ACR > softwre. > > The scene is a cluttered part of my basement, with illuminated ( and > dusty:-) foreground objects and deep shadows in the background. In the > shadows are some white surfaces that readily show noise. There's also a hot > highlight in the background -- a light reflected in a mirror. Ugly pics, but > telling examples. Note that the K-5 renders colors warmer and, as Boris > suggested earlier, the unprocessed pic appears to have less contrast. > > K-7 image: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11920154&size=lg > > K-5 image > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11920153&size=lg > > Both together: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11920155&size=lg
Grainy table or not, I'm impressed. --M. -- \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
