Thu Oct 7 07:28:34 CDT 2010 Doug Franklin wrote:
> On 2010-10-07 2:55, Bob W wrote: > > [...] > >> But the point of all this is that it's amazing how much sharper some > > photos > >> look at 1920 x 1200 on 15.4" as compared to the same image at > >> 1920 x 1200 on 24". That's why what looks ok on 4"x6" prints might not be blown up to 8"x12". > > > > you can achieve the same resolution by taking a couple of steps > > backward... > > True, but one typically doesn't. Your display is where and what it is. > Until some disrupting element arrives, you typically live with the > setup you have, rather than messing about with it. It really makes me > wonder about some of the "too fuzzy versus sharp enough" judgments I've > made about my photos over the years. Well, if you want to make a more precise judgement, you should do pixel-peeping at the level when each pixel is almost discernible by the eye. :-) Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
