A little anecdotal ... well, it's not really evidence ... let's just
call it an anecdote and leave it at that.
I've been using high resolution displays since the early 1980s when I
was writing device drivers for document imaging systems. Of course,
back then, a "high resolution" display that enterprise customers were
willing to afford ran about US$ 5,000 for a 1200 x 1600 "paper white"
CRT. Add another couple of grand for a video card that could actually
drive it at a useful refresh rate.
Anyhow, I recently had my main computer at work keel over. It /was/ a
2003 Dell, after all. So they replaced it with a pretty nice Lenovo
laptop. The point of the story is that the new laptop has a 15.4"
(diagonal) display with 1920 x 1200 resolution. In other words, pretty
small pixels, relatively. I don't know what panel technology it uses,
but the gamut looks pretty good.
But the point of all this is that it's amazing how much sharper some
photos look at 1920 x 1200 on 15.4" as compared to the same image at
1920 x 1200 on 24".
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
